for lazy dogs:
step 1:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
search greasemonkey
step 2:
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/43573
or search Facebook Mafia Wars Autoplay in site
Video:

for lazy dogs:
step 1:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
search greasemonkey
step 2:
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/43573
or search Facebook Mafia Wars Autoplay in site
Video:
| Wednesday, 22 July 2009 | |
SONA to focus on PGMA accomplishmentsPresident Gloria Macapagal Arroyo will highlight the achievements of her administration and the status of the government’s projects and programs in her upcoming State of the Nation Address (SONA) at the opening of the Joint Congress on July 27. Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita said in a press briefing today that President Arroyo will dwell on how her administration has given “too much attention to the overall welfare of the Filipinos.” He explained that President Arroyo will try to highlight the accomplishments of the major projects she initiated since 2001. Ermita cited the BEAT THE ODDS program of the government which the Chief Executive will most likely tackle on Monday’s SONA. BEAT THE ODDS is an acronym for the government’s priority project which stands for: Balance budget, Education for all, Automated elections, Transportation and digital infrastructure, Terminate hostilities with the MILF and NPA, Heal the wounds of EDSA’s I, II and III, Electricity and water for all, Opportunities for livelihood and ten million jobs, Decongestion of Metro Manila, and Develop Subic and Clark. President Arroyo, Ermita added, may also report the developments on the Super Region concept, the development in Northern Luzon, Southern Luzon and the other parts of the country. Ermita reiterated that this is President Arroyo’s last SONA and she wants to inform the Filipino people on the accomplishments of her administration and the status of the projects and programs that she initiated for the welfare of the citizens. (PND) source: |
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
FOURTEENTH CONGRESS
Second Regular Session
HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 1109
A RESOLUTION CALLING UPON THE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TO CONVENE FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSIDERING PROPOSALS TO AMEND OR REVISE THE CONSTITUTION, UPON A VOTE OF THREE-FOURTHS OF ALL MEMBERS OF CONGRESS
WHEREAS, there are proposals to amend or revise the1987 Constitution, which is presently enforced, but any of such proposals cannot be considered, heard, debated, approved or disapproved, unless any of the modes expressly provided by Article XVII of the present Constitution is adopted;
WHEREAS, adopting a mode of amending or revising the Constitution, as mandated by said Article XVII is a condition precedent, a pre-requisite, before specific proposals to amend or revise the Constitution could be considered by the Members of Congress, convened to exercise the constitutionally ordained power to amend or revise the Constitution.
WHEREAS, there is a recognized distinction between the exercise of legislative powers of Congress from the exercise of the constituent power to amend or revise the Constitution;
WHEREAS, Congress, in the exercise of its legislative power as provided in Article VI of the 1987 Constitution, cannot amend or revise the Constitution, but it is through the exercise of its constituent power under Article XVII, Section 1 of the Constitution that “any amendment to, or revision of the Constitution may be proposed, upon a vote of three-fourths of all its Members;
WHEREAS, while the prescribed method of enacting constitutional change in the 1935, 1973, and 197 Constitutions are different from the method of enacting ordinary legislation, there is a very distinct and notable difference between the 1935 and the 1987 Constitution, which respectively provides as follows:
The 1935 Constitution:
“The Congress in joint session assembled, by a vote of three-fourths of all
Members of the Senate and of the House of Representatives voting separately
may propose amendments to this Constitution or a call a convention for that
purpose.”
WHEREAS, it is to be emphasized and underscored that some essential words and phrases in the aforequoted 1935 Constitution were deleted and no longer contained in the aforequoted 1987 Constitution, such that the “amendments by deletion”are as follows:
1. The phrase “in joint session assembled” in the 1935 Constitution was deleted;
2. The phrase that the Senate and the House of Representatives, voting separately” was also deleted;
3. The percentage of voting three-fourths of the respective membership of each House (the Senate and the House of Representatives) treated separately has also been deleted and substituted with a vote of three-fourths of all the Members of Congress (i.e., ¾ of the “members of Congress” without distinction as to which institution of Congress they belong to).
WHEREAS, the intention of the amendments of the 1935 Constitution by deletions of certain words and phrases thereon by the 1987 Constitution are clear and manifest as underscored preceding WHEREAS Clauses and by such deletions, the meaning and application of the corresponding provisions of the 1987 Constitution on Amendments and Revision have been changed. There are however oppositors claiming adverse legal interests who claim that, notwithstanding that the express, clear, and unambiguous provision of Article XVII Section 1 of the 1987 Constitution that any amendment to, or revision of the 1987 Constitution that any amendment to, or revision of the 1987 Constitution shall be upon a vote of three-fourths of all the Members of Congress (i.e., not three-fourths of each House voting separately as the oppositors contend), a justiciable controversy involving the active antagonistic assertion of alleged legal rights by the oppositors, on one side, and the denial thereof by the proponents of this Resolution, on the other side, shall ripen for judicial determination as and when this Resolution calling upon the Members of Congress to convene in exercise of its constituent power is filed, heard, and approved.
WHEREAS, while no specific proposals to amend or revise the present Constitution could formally be given due course unless and until this call to convene Members of Congress, as provided therein is effected. It is hereby pledged and covenanted by the proponents of this Resolution, that by their signatures hereto that whatever constitutional changes may be proposed at the appropriate time, preferably after the constitutional issues may be proposed at the appropriate time, preferably after the constitutional issues of construction and interpretation by the Honorable Supreme Court of the justiciable controversy that may arise shall have been resolved with finality that:
1. The term of office of the incumbent President and Vice-Presidentshall not be
extended;
2. The term of office of Senators, Congressmen, Governors, Mayors, and other elected officials whose term of office shall expire in 2010 shall not be extended;
3. The term of office of twelve (12) Senators who were elected in 2007 for a six (6) year term ending in 2013 shall not be shortened and they shall be allowed to finish their term;
4. That there shall be elections in 2010.
WHEREAS, there is a specific proposal that for the Philippines to be internationally competitive in attracting foreign investments and technology transfers that the economic provisions of the Constitution is proposed to be amended in an appropriate manner, but such specific proposal to amend the present Constitution cannot be formally presented and resolved until the mode for amending or revising the Constitution is convened and made operational through the application of Article XVII of the present Constitution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT THE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS BE CONVENED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROPOSING AMENDMENTS TO, OR REVISION F THE CONSTITUTION UPON A VOTE OF THREE-FOURTHS OF ALL ITS MEMBERS AND THAT UPON ITS BEING CONVENED SHALL ADOPT TS RULES OF PROCEDURES THAT SHALL GOVERN ITS PROCEEDINGS.
Adopted.
source:
http://www.gmanews.tv/story/163952/House-Resolution-No-1109
current mood of the world is :
5/10
cons:
financial turmoil
iran’s protests
korea’s crisis
south america’s piracy
pros:
new green technology
obama’s speech of hope
no new terror threat
one of the school in bacolod city, a college school with a base hospital, a private owned and highly regarded the best in the province, is providing a review classes for nursing student in level 4.
they are reviewed by a group of professional registered nurses and a US RN degree. they are popular of their 3 letter name. and also their name is with a relation to a years of experience
all i can say that they have a ineffective teaching system, they will review you for 3 days for 4 hours a day. the lecturer will just talk about the concept but is MORE ON CHIKKA OR STORIES FROM THEIR LIVES. so most of the students who cant easily catch up or cope up the topic maybe due to stress , occupied mind or any thing that hinders their concentration is have difficulty of their post test because ITS NOT A VERY INEFFECTIVE TEACHING.
just what a clinical instructor said to a section that its true its not effective because the network of lecturers will just have to speed up because in order to finish their concept in that few 3 days of time.
adiv eiger
mobile: 0906-3981793
landline: 034-707-3989
san dionisio
8.50pm
11sept2007
+639170000240
8.42pm
11sept2007
+639170000240
“The Associated Press reports that astrophysicist Stephen Hawking wants humans to establish colonies in space in order to ensure the survival of the human race. At a news conference in Hong Kong, Hawking said that ‘It is important for the human race to spread out into space for the survival of the species. Life on Earth is at the ever-increasing risk of being wiped out by a disaster, such as sudden global warming, nuclear war, a genetically engineered virus or other dangers we have not yet thought of.’”
ref: http://science.slashdot.org/science/06/06/13/1522243.shtml